For scientific integrity, most researchers are governed by the 2018 Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. What are your experiences with that code and what should be modified in a subsequent version?
Go directly to: navigation
Go directly to: content
A review of the code is currently under way and the committee is keen to engage with users. Subjects that will receive specific attention in that review are transparency about ancillary activities and external funding and independence. Two meetings will be held in November for scientists from universities, universities of applied science, academic hospitals and other research institutes.
Share your experiences
If you are unable to attend the meetings, but would still like to share your experiences about the usefulness of the code, please e-mail to evaluatieNGWI@knaw.nl. Needless to say, the committee cannot deal with your personal case.
Zie ook
![Cover image of the publication Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.]()
PublicationNetherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
The Academy, Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centres (NFU), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Associated Applied Research Institutes (TO2), Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences (VH), and the Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) worked together to thoroughly amend and expand 'the Code' that has been in use since 2004.
View publication- Publication
Evaluatie Nederlandse gedragscode wetenschappelijke integriteit
Voor wetenschappelijk onderzoekers aan de universiteiten, hogescholen, academische ziekenhuizen en een groot aantal onderzoeksinstituten geldt de 'Nederlandse gedragscode wetenschappelijke integriteit'. Die geeft principes, richtlijnen en normen voor goede, integere wetenschapsbeoefening.
View publication
