According to the Academy, proper assessment of the risks involved in collaborating with a foreign institution or appointing a researcher from outside Europe demands a case-by-case approach:
- Reinforce the existing mechanisms (the National Guidelines and the National Contact Point), raise awareness among researchers, policymakers and administrators, and provide them with support.
- Assign responsibility for knowledge security where it belongs: the research institutions themselves.
- It is researchers themselves who can best determine where the dangers and sensitivities of their research lie. They should therefore always be involved when international partnerships are being considered.
- Knowledge security issues differ greatly between the exact sciences, engineering, the medical/biomedical and social sciences, and the humanities. There should therefore be a separate assessment framework for each discipline.
- Determine security risks based on such factors as the type of research (basic or applied), the development stage of a technology, the degree of freedom in the research partner's country, the geopolitical ambitions of governments, etc.
The Academy also points out the terminological confusion that often arises when we talk about ‘knowledge security’. In its view, knowledge security encompasses (1) the undesirable transfer of knowledge and technology that may pose a threat to national security, (2) covert influence and interference by or from other states, and (3) ethical and integrity issues. It is important to always include these three aspects of knowledge security in discussions.